legible·autonomy
Grant v1

Review queue

Only the exceptions reach you — each with the plain-English reason it was held and the authority it would need to pass.

3 need you
Brightline Logistics$210
supplies · PO-4480 · received 2026-05-20
Escalated: Brightline Logistics is not on the approved vendor list.
Why — rule trace under Grant v1
Vendor is approved
Brightline Logistics is not on the approved vendor list
Category is allowed
supplies is an allowed category
Amount within cap
$210 ≤ $500 cap
Within authority window
received 2026-05-20, within 2026-01-01 → 2026-12-31
Authority is active
Grant v1 is active
Has matching purchase order
matching purchase order not required
Not a duplicate
no earlier duplicate found
view raw trace
[
  {
    "rule": "vendor",
    "label": "Vendor is approved",
    "passed": false,
    "detail": "Brightline Logistics is not on the approved vendor list"
  },
  {
    "rule": "category",
    "label": "Category is allowed",
    "passed": true,
    "detail": "supplies is an allowed category"
  },
  {
    "rule": "amount",
    "label": "Amount within cap",
    "passed": true,
    "detail": "$210 ≤ $500 cap"
  },
  {
    "rule": "validity",
    "label": "Within authority window",
    "passed": true,
    "detail": "received 2026-05-20, within 2026-01-01 → 2026-12-31"
  },
  {
    "rule": "grant_active",
    "label": "Authority is active",
    "passed": true,
    "detail": "Grant v1 is active"
  },
  {
    "rule": "matching_order",
    "label": "Has matching purchase order",
    "passed": true,
    "detail": "matching purchase order not required"
  },
  {
    "rule": "duplicate",
    "label": "Not a duplicate",
    "passed": true,
    "detail": "no earlier duplicate found"
  }
]
Authority it would need
  • →would auto-handle if this vendor were added to approved vendors
Copper Kettle Roasters$640
coffee · PO-4490 · received 2026-05-28
Escalated: $640 > $500 cap.
Why — rule trace under Grant v1
Amount within cap
$640 > $500 cap
Vendor is approved
Copper Kettle Roasters is an approved vendor
Category is allowed
coffee is an allowed category
Within authority window
received 2026-05-28, within 2026-01-01 → 2026-12-31
Authority is active
Grant v1 is active
Has matching purchase order
matching purchase order not required
Not a duplicate
no earlier duplicate found
view raw trace
[
  {
    "rule": "vendor",
    "label": "Vendor is approved",
    "passed": true,
    "detail": "Copper Kettle Roasters is an approved vendor"
  },
  {
    "rule": "category",
    "label": "Category is allowed",
    "passed": true,
    "detail": "coffee is an allowed category"
  },
  {
    "rule": "amount",
    "label": "Amount within cap",
    "passed": false,
    "detail": "$640 > $500 cap"
  },
  {
    "rule": "validity",
    "label": "Within authority window",
    "passed": true,
    "detail": "received 2026-05-28, within 2026-01-01 → 2026-12-31"
  },
  {
    "rule": "grant_active",
    "label": "Authority is active",
    "passed": true,
    "detail": "Grant v1 is active"
  },
  {
    "rule": "matching_order",
    "label": "Has matching purchase order",
    "passed": true,
    "detail": "matching purchase order not required"
  },
  {
    "rule": "duplicate",
    "label": "Not a duplicate",
    "passed": true,
    "detail": "no earlier duplicate found"
  }
]
Authority it would need
  • →would auto-handle if the cap were raised to cover this amount
Copper Kettle Roasters$208
supplies · PO-4104 · received 2026-06-01
Escalated: duplicate of an earlier invoice.
Why — rule trace under Grant v1
Not a duplicate
duplicate of an earlier invoice
Vendor is approved
Copper Kettle Roasters is an approved vendor
Category is allowed
supplies is an allowed category
Amount within cap
$208 ≤ $500 cap
Within authority window
received 2026-06-01, within 2026-01-01 → 2026-12-31
Authority is active
Grant v1 is active
Has matching purchase order
matching purchase order not required
view raw trace
[
  {
    "rule": "vendor",
    "label": "Vendor is approved",
    "passed": true,
    "detail": "Copper Kettle Roasters is an approved vendor"
  },
  {
    "rule": "category",
    "label": "Category is allowed",
    "passed": true,
    "detail": "supplies is an allowed category"
  },
  {
    "rule": "amount",
    "label": "Amount within cap",
    "passed": true,
    "detail": "$208 ≤ $500 cap"
  },
  {
    "rule": "validity",
    "label": "Within authority window",
    "passed": true,
    "detail": "received 2026-06-01, within 2026-01-01 → 2026-12-31"
  },
  {
    "rule": "grant_active",
    "label": "Authority is active",
    "passed": true,
    "detail": "Grant v1 is active"
  },
  {
    "rule": "matching_order",
    "label": "Has matching purchase order",
    "passed": true,
    "detail": "matching purchase order not required"
  },
  {
    "rule": "duplicate",
    "label": "Not a duplicate",
    "passed": false,
    "detail": "duplicate of an earlier invoice"
  }
]
Authority it would need
  • →flagged as a duplicate — needs a human to confirm it's intentional